Legal Opinion

Smith v. Davis

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1919No. 9423PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error to Weld District Court, Hon. Neil F. Graham, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Teller.

*129Plaintiffs in error were makers of a promissory note to the order of defendant in error, which they secured by a deed of trust on a tract of land.

Before the maturity of the note they conveyed the land to one Ruck who assumed the note. One Webb, a real estate agent and friend of Davis, took some part in the making of the loan, being brought into the transaction by Davis, and subsequently assumed to act as the agent of defendant in error.

The note not having been paid, the defendant in error brought suit against the makers of it, and Ruck, as well as several other…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Union Mutual Life Insurance v. HanfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Starbird v. CranstonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Moses v. Diocese of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. Stortroen v. Beneficial Finance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. Brownson v. HannahSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  4. Stapler v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  5. Cheney v. HaileyColorado Court of Appeals · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API