William Henry Frison v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant, having been convicted of an offense against the United States from which judgment no appeal was taken, seeks to have produced at government expense the transcript of the trial proceedings and other documents because he “is going to make a collateral attack upon his conviction pursuant to the provisions of Section 2255, Title 28 U.S.C.A. * * * ” The trial court denied the application.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in Prince v. United States, 10 Cir., 312 F.2d 252; Pearson v. United States, 10 Cir., 313 F.2d 868; Lingo v. United States, 10 Cir., 320 F.2d 260.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Troy Lee Prince v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- O'Neal Henry Pearson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Robert Thomas Lingo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
3Cited by3 opinions
- Floyd Woodrow Hines v. J. E. Baker, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Larry Warren Jackson and Santa A. Liberatore v. John W. Turner, Warden Utah State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- Vernon Sides v. Harry C. Tinsley, Warden, Colorado State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964