Legal Opinion

Tennessee Coal, Iron R. Co. v. Kimball

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 19, 1923No. 6 Div. 845PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, O. J.

There was no error in overruling the defendant’s demurrer to counts 2 and A because of their failure to show or charge that the things complained of resulted from the same transaction. We think each of the counts shows that the entry into the house and leaving the door open was but one continuous act, and do not think that they are reasonably susceptible of the interpretation that defendant’s servants broke into the house and removed the refrigerator, then fastened the door, and returned at some other time and ppened the door and left it open. These counts are unlike the one…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Watson v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  2. Argo v. WalstonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  3. Argo v. WalstonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  4. Danley-Evers Furniture Co. v. CauleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API