Cardell v. Ryder
Supreme Court of Vermont
Bill in Chancery. The facts in this case appear sufficiently in the opinion of the court. The chancellor, at the January Term, 1861, in Orange county, pro forma, dismissed the hill, from which decree the oratrix appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtPeck, J.
This is a bill to foreclose a mortgage executed by the defendant McIntyre and others to the defendant George W. Ryder, the mortgagors having sold and conveyed the premises to the defendant Howard since the date of the mortgage. So far as it relates to the defendants McIntyre and Howard, the hill is substantially a bill to foreclose the mortgage. The defendant Ryder is made a party on the ground that he denies the right of the oratrix to the notes and mortgage, and has a bill pending to foreclose the mortgage in his own name and for his own use and benefit, commenced before the commencement of…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Child v. PearlSupreme Court of Vermont · 1870
- Hackett v. MoxleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1892
- Fletcher v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1903
- Potter v. PotterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1892
- Crooks v. CrooksOhio Supreme Court · 1878