Candler v. Kirksey
Supreme Court of Georgia
Forfeiture of recognizance. Before Judge Reece. City court of Floyd county. October 29, 1900.
1Opinion of the CourtFish, J.
This was a proceeding to forfeit a criminal recognizance. In defense to the scire facias, the sureties set up that the indictment against their principal was fatally defective; and counsel for the State practically conceded this to be true. The court below discharged the sureties, and this is the ruling of which complaint is made in the bill of exceptions. The question thus made has been settled by the decisions of this court, which we are now asked to review. In State v. Lockhart, 24 Ga. 420, in ruling upon the *310point, the court said: “In Liceth et al. vs. Cobb, Governor, &c., 18 Ga. Rep.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McDaniel v. CampbellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- State v. LockhartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1858
- State v. WoodleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1858
- Liceth v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. HaverstickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Mason v. TerrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Cook v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Rogers v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Williams v. CandlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.