Legal Opinion

Michael v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 10, 2006No. 5D05-3728PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant challenges the summary denial of his rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. We affirm except as to ground three of his motion, which asserts that based on defense counsel’s misinformation as to the potential maximum sentence he could receive at trial, Appellant rejected a plea offer for a significantly shorter sentence than the habitual felony offender sentence that was imposed after trial. As the State concedes on appeal, the trial court failed to attach portions of the record that conclusively negate Appellant’s allegation. On remand, the trial court shall either attach…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Payne v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API