Legal Opinion

Minneapolis Association v. Canfield

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 18, 1887No. 175PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE rnHE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OE MINNESOTA. In equity. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

The original bill in this case was filed August 14, 1877, by Thomas II. Canfield, a citizen of the state of Vermont, against the Minneapolis, Agricultural and Mechanical Association, a corporation created under the laws of the state of Minnesota, and the State National Bank of Minneapolis, a corporation organized under the laws of the United States, at Minneapolis, in the state of Minnesota. Its general, purpose Avas to establish the equities of the complainant in the capital stock and corporate property of the Minneapolis Agricultural and Mechanical Association as against the claims of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Baldwin v. CanfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. City of Mankato v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  3. Canfield v. State Nat. Bank of MinneapolisU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1877
  4. Elrae Corp. v. Bankers Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
  5. Timex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API