Legal Opinion
Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. Michigan State Telephone Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 18, 1924No. Calendar 30,520PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.
Plaintiff, Michigan public utilities commission, made, in July, 1922, an order to establish rates of defendant, Michigan State Telephone Company. An amendment making the order more specifically applicable to Detroit was made later. Defendant refused to obey the order. It filed a bill in the United States district court at Detroit. An interlocutory injunction issued. To compel obedience plaintiff instituted mandamus in the circuit court for Ingham county. Counsel agreed that plaintiff might apply to this court for an order requiring defendant to show cause why it should not comply with the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- City of Knoxville v. Knoxville Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- San Diego Land & Town Co. v. National CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United Rs. & Elec. Co. of Baltimore v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- People Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Hope Natural Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.