Legal Opinion

Peters v. UNSAT. C. & J. FUND BD.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 18, 1974No. [No. 190, September Term, 1973.]Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

271 Md. 304 (1974)

316 A.2d 803

PETERS

v.

UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD

[No. 190, September Term, 1973.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided March 18, 1974.

The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SINGLEY, SMITH, DIGGES, LEVINE and ELDRIDGE, JJ.

John S. Mahle, Jr., for appellant.

G. Raymond Valle, Assistant Attorney General, and George L. Huber, Jr., with whom were Francis B. Burch, Attorney General, and Arnold, Beauchemin & Huber, P.A. on the brief, for appellee.

2Opinion of the Court · LevineLevine, J.

This appeal arises out of appellant's unsuccessful effort to obtain from appellee (the Board) payment of a judgment in…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Richard Thomas Carr and Doreen Carr v. United States of America, William Granville Reynolds, Sr., and Joseph B. BiggsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
  2. Maddy v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  3. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  4. Mundey v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  5. Claim of Bellini v. Great American Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API