Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Dual

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided June 2, 1955No. A-8421PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGE, District Judge.

Two questions are principally presented to the Court for decision in this case, which I find to be succinctly stated in the opening paragraph of the brief of the plaintiff, and that is in an action to foreclose a mortgage in which the plaintiff seeks the appointment of a receiver to collect and hold the rents and profits, (1) to what extent must there be shown an inadequacy of security under the Alaska statute; and (2) are the allegations of the complaint and the supporting affidavit relating to the inadequacy of the security sufficient. It is strenuously argued by the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nielsen v. HealdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  2. Central West Public Service Co. v. CraigCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  3. Totten v. HarloweDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1937
  4. Fairbank v. CudworthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  5. French v. C. F. & T. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Fairbanks v. DualAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Boucher Investments, L.P. v. Annapolis-West Limited PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API