Legal Opinion

Watkiss & Campbell v. Foa & Son

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1991No. 890045Published

1Opinion of the Court

808 P.2d 1061 (1991)

WATKISS & CAMPBELL, a professional corporation, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

FOA & SON, a New York corporation, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 890045.

Supreme Court of Utah.

March 22, 1991.

L. Charles Spafford, Chase Kimball, Salt Lake City, for defendant and appellant.

Vincent C. Rampton, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and appellee.

HALL, Chief Justice:

Defendant Foa & Son appeals from a grant of plaintiff Watkiss & Campbell's motion for summary judgment. The district court determined that no genuine issue of material fact existed with respect to the amount billed by plaintiff for…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Turtle Management, Inc. v. Haggis Management, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Canyon Country Store v. BraceyUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchettlerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  4. Salt Lake City Corp. v. James Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  5. Dupler v. YatesUtah Supreme Court · 1960

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API