Legal Opinion

Depuy v. Hoeme

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 19, 1980No. 50472, 51960PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Justice:

This case arises out of two separate causes of action, both dealing with the use of water from a playa lake, Wild Horse Lake, located in Texas County, Oklahoma. Because both cases (Depuy v. Hoeme, Case No. 50,472, and Depuy v. Oklahoma Resources Board, Case No. 51,960) deal with use of water from Wild Horse Lake and because both arise out of the same factual background, the cases were, by order of this Court, consolidated for appeal under the surviving number of 50,472.

I

We will first consider Depuy v. Hoeme. Wild Horse Lake is a natural playa lake located in the SW/4 of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  2. In re German Ditch & Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  3. Iven v. RoderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. Lynn v. RaineySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  5. Doney v. BeattyMontana Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Depuy v. HoemeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API