Legal Opinion

Hughbanks Incorporated v. Gourley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1941No. 28409PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Plaintiff, Hughbanks Incorporated, claiming to be the owner and entitled to the immediate possession of certain automotive machinery, instituted a claim and delivery proceeding under Rem. Rev. Stat., § 573 [P. C. § 7843], to procure the surrender thereof from defendant W. B. Severyns, sheriff of King county, who had theretofore taken the machinery from one Elmer W. Findley pursuant to a writ of attachment previously issued in a civil action for debt brought by defendant R. C. Gourley against Findley. Defendant Gourley appeared in opposition to plaintiff’s claim. Upon a summary trial by the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lyon v. NourseWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Sayward v. NunanWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Olsen v. Legal Adjustment Bureau, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Payne v. ParkerMississippi Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Commercial Securities Corp. Cons. v. Lindsay Mercantile Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hafer v. SpaethWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  2. National Bank of Commerce v. ThomsenWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Beatty v. Western Pacific InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. General Electric Capital Commercial Automotive Finance, Inc. v. Spartan Motors, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. George Hess v. Sam Paulo, Sr.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API