Legal Opinion

Lohr v. Ford

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 25, 1952No. 4727PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiseman, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the Municipal Court of Columbus.

Plaintiff, a real estate broker, sued to recover his commission for procuring a purchaser for the residence owned by defendant. The trial court rendered judgment for defendant on the theory that the plaintiff had not procured a purchaser who was ready, willing and able to buy.

In his petition, plaintiff alleged that he was employed by the defendant to find a purchaser for $15, 750; that he found a purchaser at the stipulated price; and that the defendant and the purchaser entered into a written contract of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. MasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Scudder v. WallaceOhio Court of Appeals · 1946

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Century 21 American Landmark, Inc. v. McIntyreOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Harley E. Rouda & Co. v. Springtime Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Biggs v. Bernard, Exr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. A. A. Realty Co. v. Warner & Albright Town & Country, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. McGarry v. McCroneOhio Court of Appeals · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API