Legal Opinion

Richman v. Richman

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1962PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLouis B. Heller, J.

In this habeas corpus proceeding the petitioner husband, who is separated from his wife, respondent herein, seeks a determination as to custody of the infant son of the parties, who has been in the care and charge of respondent since January, 1960. The child, who became five years of age in February of this year, is the sole issue of the parties.

Petitioner seeks custody on the ground that the respondent is unfit, by reason of mental disability to properly rear the child.

At the outset, I wish to commend the attorneys in this proceeding for their able and helpful presentation of the facts and *1091of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Finlay v. FinlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. People ex rel. Kropp v. ShepskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Bunim v. BunimNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. Ullman v. UllmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  5. Reinhart v. ReinhartNew York Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Chitty v. FitzgeraldNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Abreu v. AbreuNew York City Family Court · 1965
  3. Golden v. GoldenNew York City Family Court · 1978
  4. Salk v. SalkNew York Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API