Legal Opinion

Hull v. Hull

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 1913PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Bates Circuit Court. — Hon. Charles A. Calvird, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtTrimble, J.

Suit for divorce on the ground of indignities. The answer and cross-bill denied the charges, alleged indignities on the part of plaintiff and prayed a divorce for defendant. The case began in the circuit court of Vernon county, but on a change of venue applied for by defendant, was sent to Bates county. There a trial was had and a judgment rendered in which defendant was allowed $300 temporary alimony, a divorce awarded plaintiff on his petition and defendant’s cross-bill dismissed.

The sole error complained of by appellant is that the evidence is insufficient to justify a divorce to plaintiff.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nichols v. NicholsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Nash v. Kansas City HyDraulic Press Brick Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Yancy v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bowers v. BowersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API