Legal Opinion

State v. Nunn

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 29, 1989No. CM 88-0243; CA A51003PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

Defendant appeals her conviction, after a stipulated facts trial, for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. She assigns as error the trial court’s failure to grant her motion to suppress. We affirm.

This is a case of first impression in this state. The issue is whether an affidavit supporting a search warrant is defective because the magistrate who issued the warrant failed to sign the jurat attesting that the affidavit was executed under oath.

Defendant contends that the magistrate’s failure to sign the jurat makes the warrant constitutionally insufficient, because it denies her…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McAfeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. WILLIAMSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Milne v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Milne v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. KeithTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  3. State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. State of Iowa v. Maurice D. Angel and Kemia B. McDowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API