Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Woodruff

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 12, 1964No. 5-3322PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jim Johnson, Associate Justice.

This is an action by appellants Dave Hicks and Billy D. Hicks, his son, for specific performance of an option to purchase clause contained in a farm lease contract, against appellees Thomas E. Woodruff and Pauline B. Woodruff, his wife, and Dewey Beavers and Naomi Beavers, his wife, in Chicot Chancery Court. After a long drawn out hearing the diligent chancellor concluded in 31 pages of findings that the lease was operative, that the option was ambiguous, that appellants had failed to comply with the terms of the option and that appellants’ complaint should…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Synergy Gas Corp. v. H.M. Orsburn & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
  2. David M. Lide, Jr. v. Roy Carothers, United States of America, Bank of Oak Grove, Charolais International and Bank of DixieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  3. Cockrum v. McCallieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  4. Standard Abstract & Title Co. v. Rector-Phillips-Morse, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  5. General Mortgage Corp. v. PeacockCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API