Barricini, Inc. v. Barricini Shoes, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to restrain the use of the name “Barricini” by respondents and for other relief, the appeal is from an order denying appellants’ motion to restrain such use during the pendency of the action. Order affirmed, without costs. There was no showing by appellants of such irreparable injury and such a clear right to the relief demanded as would warrant the granting of a temporary injunction affording them substantially all the relief which they could obtain if they were successful after trial. (Cf. Clark v. King & Bro. Pub. Co., 40 App. Div. 405, 408; Weiss v. Herlihy, 23 App. Div. 608,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Weiss v. HerlihyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Clark v. Herbert Booth King & Brother Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Tru Val Manufacturers, Inc. v. Tru-Valu Corner, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1955
3Cited by5 opinions
- DeLury v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Brand v. BartlettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Union Kol-Flo Corp. v. BasilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- New England Petroleum Corp. v. Asiatic Petroleum Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1975
- Unicast Development Corp. v. Mueller-Phipps International, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979