Legal Opinion

Ritterbach v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 25, 1987No. 14846PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOGAN, Judge.

Movant Harold Dean Ritterbach appeals from the dismissal without evidentiary hearing of his Rule 27.26 motion to vacate and set aside two concurrent sentences of ten (10) years’ imprisonment for the sale of a controlled substance. His conviction of these crimes was affirmed in State v. Ritterbach, 627 S.W.2d 894 (Mo.App.1982). The trial court has made concise and informative findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by Rule 27.26(e). We have drawn freely upon those findings in preparing this opinion.

The standard for determining whether a 27.26 movant is entitled to an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  2. Ray v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. State v. RitterbachMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. McClain v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Jarvis v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jackson v. Risby Pallet and Lumber Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API