Legal Opinion

State v. Hayes

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 1978No. 10774PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant was found guilty of receiving stolen property and assessed punishment at three years’ imprisonment. Thereafter a motion for new trial was filed within the time allowed by the court. However, this appeal cannot presently be considered upon its merits because the transcript on appeal fails to demonstrate that a judgment has been entered.

The purported judgment states (after reciting appearances): “. . . Verdict of jury read to defendant. Defendant renews application for parole. Argument heard by State and defense. Parole denied. Execution of sentence ordered. Defendant permitted to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. AsberryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. AndersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API