Legal Opinion

Hudson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 1, 1978No. 77-1605PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of grand larceny and uttering a forged or false instrument. We find no merit in appellant’s argument with regard to the conviction of uttering a forged or false instrument and, therefore, affirm that conviction. With regard to the conviction of grand larceny we find merit and reverse.

A cash register, cash and a number of checks were allegedly stolen from Tropical Auto Body Works, Inc. In Count I appellant was charged with larceny of the cash register and cash and in Count II appellant was charged with uttering one of the checks which had been stolen and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  2. Battle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HudsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API