Legal Opinion

OneWest Bank v. Drayton

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 2010PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1022OPINION OF THE COURT

Arthur M. Schack, J.

In this foreclosure action, plaintiff OneWest Bank, F.S.B. moved for an order of reference and related relief for the premises located at 962 Hemlock Street, Brooklyn, New York (block 4529, lot 116, County of Kings), upon the default of all defendants. The Kings County Supreme Court Foreclosure Department forwarded the motion papers to me on August 30, 2010. While drafting this decision and order, I received on October 14, 2010, in the midst of the present national media attention about “robo-signers,” an October 13, 2010 letter from plaintiffs counsel,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sokoloff v. Harriman Estates Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. 5303 Realty Corp. v. O & Y Equity Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Lamdin v. Broadway Surface Advertising Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Wechsler v. BowmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  5. Merscorp., Inc. v. RomaineNew York Court of Appeals · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Aurora Loan Services, LLC v. WeisblumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Bank of New York v. SilverbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Henning, Kenneth v. OneWest Bank FSB, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
  4. In Re AgardUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  5. Figueroa v. Merscorp, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API