Legal Opinion

Nathan Metz v. Tusico, Incorporated

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided July 6, 1957No. 7432_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment for defendant in an action to recover damages for breach of a warranty in a contract for the sale of land as to the availability of water. The case was heard without a jury by the judge who found in favor of the defendant on the ground that breach of warranty had not been shown. The judge in his findings did not specifically cover some matters which we think essential to a proper review by us of the case. We shall accordingly vacate the judgment appealed from and remand the case for further findings and with leave to the parties to adduce additional evidence…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Metz v. Tusico, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1958
  2. Nathan Metz v. Tusico, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API