Legal Opinion

Kentgen & Co. v. Jordan

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 15, 1860PublishedCited by 2 opinions

I PPEAL from the Fifth District Court of New Orleans, Eggleston. J.

1Opinion of the CourtDuffel, J.

The defendant is appellant from a judgment by default made final.

*220The default was confirmed on the presumption created by Article 3G0 of the Code of Practice, corroborated by the following- testimony : “ J. M. Wagner, for plaintiff, sworn, says : “ the account sued upon is correct.” Another witness was examined; but his testimony not having any reference to the account sued on, does not affect the decision of the cause.

The simple declaration, “ the account sued upon is correct,” was, in our opinion, insufficient to authorize the confirmation of the default; the witness should have given the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carte Blanche Plumbing & Heating Repair Service, Inc. v. Van HaelerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Electrical Supply Co. v. MosesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API