Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barnett v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 21, 1986No. 71322Published

1DissentBeasley, Judge

The defendant contends his conviction was unauthorized because the evidence failed to establish that he was a participant in the crime of aggravated assault. He recognizes that a showing of direct involvement is not necessary and that a defendant may be convicted as a party to a crime under OCGA § 16-2-20 absent physical presence at the scene. Carter v. State, 168 Ga. App. 177 (3) (308 SE2d 438) (1983).

OCGA § 16-2-20 (a) provides: “Every person concerned in the commission of a crime is a party thereto and may be charged with and convicted of commission of the crime.” The pertinent subsections…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. Gunter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  3. Burke v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  4. Hurt v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  5. Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API