Legal Opinion

People v. Clabeaux

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied the motion of defendant to suppress his statement to a police officer. Although the statement was made after defendant had received his Miranda warnings and requested counsel, it was made spontaneously and was not the result of police questioning (see, People v Harris, 57 NY2d 335, 342, cert denied 460 US 1047). Defendant’s contention that the court erred in allowing the rebuttal testimony of a State Trooper is unpreserved for our review and, in any event, is lacking in merit. The rebuttal testimony was proper because it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. PennaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. HUMPHREY, DONOVAN, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. People v. PearsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API