Stevens v. Hannan
Michigan Supreme Court
Application by plaintiff for rehearing of case reported in 86 Mich. 305. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
Upon a re-examination of the record, and the questions involved herein, I find no reason to change the opinion heretofore filed. The note in this case was payable on or before one. year from its date. Watson, plaintiff's assignor, was one of the joint makers. Watson took by assignment, indorsed upon the note, from the payee. Plaintiff had notice of Watson's rela*14tions to the note, and when he received the note from Watson he had notice that the note had been issued to Batchelder, that it had been taken up by WatBon, and through Watson plaintiff acquired it.
A single promisor may re-issue his…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gordon v. WanseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Patch v. KingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1849
3Cited by4 opinions
- Perkins v. HallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1941
- Snell v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1909
- Exchange National Bank v. ChaplineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Peltier v. McFersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919