Legal Opinion

People v. Harris

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 26, 1990No. 1-88-3121PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Egan

After a bench trial, the defendant was found guilty of public indecency and sentenced to two years’ supervision. In his original brief he contended that the trial judge erred when he permitted the State to amend its complaint at the close of its case in chief, that he was not proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and that the judge erred when he took notice of the defendant’s age. In a supplemental brief he contended that neither the original complaint nor the amended complaint charged an offense.

Chicago police officer James Grubbs testified that he was on “narcotics surveillance” at 10:30…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Campos-SerranoSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. People v. PujoueIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People v. McBrienAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. People v. CluttsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. People v. EdwardsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. DiLorenzoIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. ScottAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  4. People v. WaltonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. People v. AllenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API