State v. Tapia

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Luckert, J.:

A juiy convicted Alexander Tapia of nonresidential burglary, theft, vehicular burglary, and conspiracy to commit non*979residential burglaiy. On appeal to the Court of Appeals, Tapia argued: (1) The evidence to support his charge of conspiracy to commit nonresidential burglary was insufficient due to a defect in the complaint; (2) tire district court erred by denying his request for an accomplice jury instruction; (3) the district court violated his constitutional rights when it sentenced him to an enhanced sentence based upon his criminal…