Legal Opinion

Alliance for Retired Americans v. Bessent

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 7, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2025-0313Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 25-0313 (CKK) SCOTT BESSENT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (March 7, 2025) For a time, parts of Silicon Valley embraced an unofficial credo of disruption: “Move Fast and Break Things.”1 Plaintiffs, three large membership organizations, suggest that parts of the Executive Branch are now doing the same. Specifically, Plaintiffs argue that officials in the Department of the Treasury are moving so fast…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API