Legal Opinion

City National Bank v. DeBaum

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 7, 1924PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The’ City National Bank brought suits on the promissory notes of appellees DeBaum and Fen-tress, which were consolidated and tried together. The notes were payable to the Crystal Glass Company, and had been indorsed and delivered by that company to the bank as collateral to a loan made the company by the bank. 'The Crystal Glass Company, hereinafter referred to as the company, was .organized as a manufacturing corporation with an authorized capital of $100,000. Fifty-one thousand dollars of this stock was subscribed for, of which $10,000 was paid in cash and $41,000 in property. After the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Central Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Coppell v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Embrey v. JemisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. German Bank v. DeShonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
  5. Wilde v. WildeNebraska Supreme Court · 1893

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ashley & Rumelin v. BradyIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Bank of Dermott v. MeaselSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  3. Bank of Manila v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  4. Scoggins v. Furst ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Intermountain Title Guaranty Co. v. EgbertIdaho Supreme Court · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API