Legal Opinion

McCoy v. Oilily B.V.

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided April 10, 2008No. MDL No. 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TRANSFER ORDER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the entire Panel:* Plaintiff in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania action has moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings of this litigation in the Northern District of California. No other party to the litigation has responded to the motion.

This litigation currently consists of two actions pending in two districts, one action each in the Northern District of California and the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

After considering all argument of counsel, we find that these actions involve common…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Oilily Fair & Accur. Credit Trans. Act Lit.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API