Legal Opinion
White v. McLouth Steel Corp.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided October 28, 1969No. Docket 4,448, 4,449, 4,450, 4,451PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, P. J.
Despite the apparent confusion soon forthcoming in the recitation of the facts of this multi-party litigation, the basic issues on appeal are not difficult. Plaintiffs were injured while at work on a blast furnace at McLouth Steel Corporation, hereinafter referred to as McLouth. They were hired by A. E. Anderson Construction Company, hereinafter referred to as A. E. Anderson, the general contractor, to assist in the general work of relining the McLouth furnace. A provision of the contract between McLouth and A. E. Anderson provided indemnity to McLouth in the event that it became subject to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Builders Supply Co. v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Westchester Lighting Co. v. Westchester County Small Estates Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Husted v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Lunderberg v. BiermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Dale v. WhitemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Williams v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Nanasi v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- McLouth Steel Corp. v. A. E. Anderson Construction Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- Gartside v. Young Men's Christian Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.