Legal Opinion
Estate of Chlopek Ex Rel. Fahrforth v. Jarmusz
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 28, 1995No. 93 C 3348PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge:
Before the court is the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons, the motion is granted.
FACTS 1
On June 6, 1992, Defendant Officer David Jarmusz (“Jarmusz”) shot and killed Joseph Chlopek (“Chlopek”). Plaintiffs brought this action alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1988, and various state law claims. In November 1993, the court dismissed a number of the named defendants and all references to § 1985 claims. Two defendants remain in the case: Jarmusz and the City of Chicago.
A brief background of this contemporary…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Elder v. HollowaySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Estate of Suskovich v. Anthem Health Plans of Virginia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Rosen v. Neilson (In Re Slatkin)District Court, C.D. California · 2004
- In Re Balanced Plan, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2001
- Arrington v. City of Chicago, IllinoisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
- Estate of Anthony J. Suskovich v. Anthem Health Plans of VirginiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.