State Highway Department v. Peavy

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The defendant in error, Mrs. Daisy Holder Peavy, made a motion to dismiss the writ of error in this court on the ground that Stewart County, although a vitally interested party which had actually paid the award of the assessors in this case and would have to pay any further award, had not been made a party to the bill of exceptions. The only parties in the proceeding in the superior court were the State Highway. Department, who is the. plaintiff in error here, and Mrs. Peavy. “The rule that.all persons interested in sustaining the judgment complained of…