Legal Opinion

Rice v. Russell-Stanley, L.P.

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided January 28, 2004No. 10-01-261-CVPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOM GRAY, Chief Justice.

Adolph Rice was removed from his position as traffic coordinator for Russell- Stanley L.P. Rice alleges the removal was because of his age and, thus, violated state law. He filed suit in state court approximately six months after his removal. Russell-Stanley filed a no-evidence motion for summary judgment asserting that because Rice had no evidence he had received a TCHR right-to-sue letter, he had failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. The trial court granted the motion for summary judgment. Rice appeals.

Rice presented no evidence that he had received a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. Texas Iron Works, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Moore v. K Mart Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  3. Vielma v. Eureka CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  4. City of Houston v. Fletcher, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  5. Springer v. American Zurich Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Public Safety v. Alexander, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
  2. Lueck v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
  3. Howe v. YellowbookDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2011
  4. City of Waco v. Kelley, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007
  5. Marquis v. OmniGuide, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2010

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API