Legal Opinion

Stenzel v. Yates

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 28, 1951No. Term 50-0-19PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Scheineman

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiffs, L. P. Stenzel and R. H. Swoboda, as taxpayers of Alexander county, filed this suit alleging that the defendants, S. N. Yates, Guy Coleman and Andrew Serbian, have control of the general fund of Alexander county, in a confidential and fiduciary capacity, and prayed an injunction restraining the said defendants from making “any clandestine, secret, illegal contract, ” from making any “illegal or improper expenditures” from said fund, and from doing any of a list of other “illegal” acts.

The complaint also alleges…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Spiegler v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Christian Hospital v. People ex rel. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Gates v. SweitzerIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co. v. Cook Lumber Terminal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1930
  5. Knopf v. Chicago Real Estate BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. O'BRIEN v. MatualAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  2. Shatz v. PaulAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
  3. McErlean v. Harvey Area Community OrganizationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  4. G. H. Sternberg & Co. v. CelliniAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  5. Miollis v. SchneiderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API