Legal Opinion

Smookler v. Nicoll Bros. Oil, Inc.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 7, 1937No. 14,107PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burke

These parties appear heret in the same order as in the trial court and are hereinafter referred to as there.

Plaintiff sued defendant in justice court for $300 due, as is said, on a certain lease. A trial there resulted in a judgment for defendant for costs. Plaintiff appealed to the county court where the cause was tried de novo, to the court without a jury, with the same result. To review the latter judgment plaintiff prosecutes this writ and assigns two errors, i. e., “1. That judgment is contrary to the law. 2. That judgment is contrary to the evidence.”

These assignments are no compliance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. BurgessSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
  2. Ohio Casualty Insurance v. Colorado Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  3. Wilson v. GiemSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Platte Valley Elevators Co. v. GebauerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  2. Stone v. LernerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API