Harris v. Ohio Dep't of Veterans Servs.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1DissentSadler, J.
{¶ 34} Because I find that Harris's complaint fails to state a claim for relief in mandamus, I would affirm the judgment of the common pleas court. Because the majority does not, I respectfully dissent.
{¶ 35} In support of its motion to dismiss in the trial court, the Ohio Veterans' Homes ("OVH") argued that Harris's "currently pending SPBR appeal constitutes an adequate remedy at law until he exhausts his administrative remedies." (Trial Ct. Decision at 6.) I agree.
{¶ 36} "The exhaustion of administrative remedies doctrine requires a person to exhaust available statutory administrative…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State ex rel. Midwest Pride IV, Inc. v. PontiousOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Kulch v. Structural Fibers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
- Lywanna COOPER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED, Et Al., Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- State ex rel. Crabtree v. Franklin County Board of HealthOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Edwards v. Toledo City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.