Legal Opinion
Headley v. Knox
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 4, 1955No. Civ. No. 2735PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONOVAN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on an Order to Show Cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue, enjoining and restraining the defendant from collecting or attempting to collect monies and property of the plaintiffs under and by virtue of warrants of distraint.
A short statement of the pertinent facts is as follows: Plaintiffs were the officers of a corporation known as the St.
*37Paul Basketball, Inc. The corporation sought to conduct professional basketball activities in the City of St. Paul, but, suffering financial reverses, was adjudicated a bankrupt in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Plunkett v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
- Reams v. Vrooman-Fehn Printing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
- Dyer v. GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Botta v. ScanlonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Roberts v. ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Bolme v. NixonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1965
- Rosner v. McGinnesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
- Iraci v. ScanlonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.