Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of Proceedings of Moodie

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 16, 1927PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Slater, S.

The main item in the bill of the claimant Mary Kerslake is for services rendered. The testimony was clear, and it is not denied that the services were rendered by the claimant as housekeeper, cook and as practical nurse in the home and office of the physician, the testator herein. The executrix contends there was no agreement to pay for services rendered, other than by the board of the claimant and her husband. The evidence is ample, clear and convincing that the testator agreed to pay for services rendered. There is no rule of law that the claimant’s contract must be in writing.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McKeon v. . Van SlyckNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Caldwell v. . LucasNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of WoodNew York Surrogate's Court · 1919
  4. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of MoodieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API