Legal Opinion

Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. Sarman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 14, 1927No. 17363PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

In this case the defendant filed a plea of res adjudicata, which was submitted to the trial judge for determination without the intervention of a jury, upon an agreed statement of facts. The judge, upon a consideration of the pleadings and the agreed facts, ordered “that said plea be not sustained and that judgment be and it is hereby rendered in favor of the plaintiff upon said plea.” The defendant has ’brought the case to this court, assigning error upon this judgment. There were no other proceedings in the court below.

Although there has been no motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Teasley v. CordellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Berryman v. HadenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Harvey v. BowlesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. United Glass Co. v. McConnellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Floyd v. Massachusetts MillsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  2. McCray Refrigerator Sales Corp. v. NewCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  3. Snell v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API