State v. Pearsall
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.
¶1 Karla Gae Pearsall appeals her jury-conviction for unlawful possession of a controlled substance.1 She argues that the search of her vehicle incident to her arrest was illegal and, therefore, the evidence should be suppressed. We remand to the trial court for further proceedings.
¶2 We incorporate by reference the facts set forth in our May 25, 2010 published opinion affirming Pearsall’s conviction. State v. Pearsall, 156 Wn. App. 357, 231 P.3d 849 (2010) (Houghton, J., dissenting). We held that under our decision in State v. Millan, 151 Wn. App. 492, 212 P.3d 603 (2009), reversed sub nom.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- State v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. MillanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. MillanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. PearsallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011