Legal Opinion

Twin K Construction, Inc. v. UMA, Geotechnical Construction, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided March 23, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00074Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE TWIN K CONSTRUCTION, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 3:21-CV-74-DCP ) UMA, GEOTECHNICAL ) CONSTRUCTION, INC., ) ) Defendant, ) ) and ) ) CLAY BRIGHT, in his official capacity as ) Commissioner of Tennessee Department of ) Transportation (TDOT), ) ) Third-Party Nominal Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This case is before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Rule 73(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the consent of the parties, for all further proceedings, including entry of judgment [Doc. 20].…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. WingetCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. Sensations, Inc. v. City of Grand RapidsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  3. Beacon4, LLC v. I & L Investments, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016
  4. Weems v. Paul R. Walker Co. (In re James)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API