Stehle v. Zimmerebner
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1ConcurrenceHoward W. Brill, Chief Justice
I agree with the majority’s decision to reverse and remand, but I write separately to provide a comprehensive analysis for my conclusion.
I. Coercive Civil Contempt
As early as the tenth century, the common law recognized the power of contempt.1 With the development of the chancery courts, the law of contempt split into criminal and civil contempt. See Omni Holding & Dev. Corp. v. 3D.S.A., Inc., 356 Ark. 440, 156 S.W.3d 228 (2004). Criminal contempt preserves the power of the court, vindicates its dignity, and punishes those who willfully disobey its orders, either directly or indirectly. Id.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Turner v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Ivy v. KeithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Omni Holding & Development Corp. v. 3D.S.A., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena. United States of America v. Susan H. McDougalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.