Legal Opinion

Anastasi v. Knowles

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 6, 2009No. C057851Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NICHOLSON, Acting P. J.

Family Code section 4057.5, subdivision (a)(1) prohibits consideration of the income of a subsequent spouse when modifying child support. Here, the father and his subsequent spouse owned substantial community assets, which generated income. In modifying a child support order, the trial court considered, as the father’s income, all of the community income of the father and his subsequent spouse. In the published portion of this opinion, we conclude that the trial court violated Family Code section 4057.5, subdivision (a)(1) by considering the half of the community…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Green v. Ralee Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
  2. United States v. MalcolmSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. In Re Marriage of BurgessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. In Re Marriage of FellowsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Calhoun v. Vallejo City Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API