Legal Opinion

Toop v. Palmer

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1922No. 20805PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

This is an action by plaintiffs to recover from defendants rents, expenses of former litigation, and attorneys’ fees, aggregating $11,821.86. The parties do not agree on the nature of the suit. Plaintiffs contend they brought an action at law to recover damages for fraud and conspiracy. Defendants insist that the suit is one in equity to adjust mutual accounts, that they pleaded equitable defenses, and that the issues were determinable under the rules of equity. The parties waived a jury. The trial judge proceeded to bring in a new party on his own motion and to determine the pleas of all…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kaplan v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Adams v. OsgoodNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  3. State v. ToopNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  4. State ex rel. Toop v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Toop v. PalmerNebraska Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ritter v. RitterIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Landstrom v. ThorpeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
  3. McGill v. Lion Place Condo. Assn.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Harmon Care Centers, Inc. v. KnightNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Millard Gutter Co. v. American Family Ins. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API