Wells v. Cagle Albrecht & Co.

Several issues are raised in the pleadings in this case, but they have ajl been eliminated, except one. It is not necessary to state any of them, except the one before the court.

That qne is as follows:

The plaintiff, Wells, owns a plantation in Richland parish, which he leased to the defendant, Cagle, for the year 1926.

Cagle being without means to operate the plantation, in 1926, sought and obtained from Wells a loan of $1500.00 with which to make his crop.

The money advanced by Wells was used by Cagle in making the crop. Wells, therefore, had a privilege on the proceeds of the farm that year…