Villa v. Van Schaick
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
The Southern Surety Company, an insurance company organized under the laws of New York and doing business there and in other States, is being liquidated by the state superintendent of insurance. In the course of its business, the Company acted as an insurance carrier for employers in relation to claims under the compensation laws of New York and other States. Upon his first report, the liquidator sought the direction of the state court to pay in full, as preferred under § 34 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law of New York, all compensation claimants who had filed preferred claims under the New…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dorchy v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Patterson v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Watts, Watts & Co. v. Unione Austriaca Di NavigazioneSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Clark v. WilliardSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. DennisSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Xiao Xing Ni v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Ruhlin v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Walling v. James v. Reuter, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Braden v. University of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.